Multi-Regional Geospatial ML Infrastructure

At Pixxel, multi-regional ML infrastructure improved inference efficiency by 75%, reduced map-rendering latency by 50%, and supported ETL and ML pipelines processing more than 1 TB each day.

Processed daily
1TB+
Inference-efficiency improvement
75%
Lower map-rendering latency
50%
How the multi-regional geospatial ML infrastructure moves data to maps More than a terabyte of geospatial data a day runs through schema-aware ETL into a GPU queue; automated A/B testing picks the regional model, and inference feeds latency-sensitive map rendering. Geospatial data (1TB+ daily) flows to ETL pipelines (Schema handling) [1TB+/day]; ETL pipelines (Schema handling) flows to GPU queue (Scheduling); GPU queue (Scheduling) flows to Regional GPUs (Inference) [jobs]; A/B testing (Regional models) drives Regional GPUs (Inference) [selects]; Regional GPUs (Inference) flows to Map rendering (Latency-sensitive). Owned by Sudhanva: ETL pipelines, GPU queue and A/B testing. Outcomes: Inference efficiency: Baseline to +75%; Map-rendering latency: Baseline to −50%; Schema-caused failures: Baseline to −30%. MULTI-REGIONAL INFRA 1TB+ DAILY Geospatial data SCHEMA HANDLING ETL pipelines SCHEDULING GPU queue REGIONAL MODELS A/B testing INFERENCE Regional GPUs LATENCY-SENSITIVE Map rendering 1TB+/day jobs selects INFERENCE EFFICIENCY Baseline +75% MAP-RENDERING LATENCY Baseline −50% SCHEMA-CAUSED FAILURES Baseline −30% Owned by Sudhanva Data Control
How the multi-regional geospatial ML infrastructure moves data to maps MULTI-REGIONAL INFRA 1TB+ DAILY Geospatial data SCHEMA HANDLING ETL pipelines SCHEDULING GPU queue REGIONAL MODELS A/B testing INFERENCE Regional GPUs LATENCY-SENSITIVE Map rendering 1TB+/day jobs INFERENCE EFFICIENCY Baseline +75% MAP-RENDERING LATENCY Baseline −50% SCHEMA-CAUSED FAILURES Baseline −30% Owned by Sudhanva Data Control
More than a terabyte of geospatial data a day runs through schema-aware ETL into a GPU queue; automated A/B testing picks the regional model, and inference feeds latency-sensitive map rendering.

Confidentiality note. Employer-specific implementation details, internal names, and proprietary scientific context have been intentionally generalized. The scale, responsibilities, technologies, and outcomes below are limited to facts already published in Sudhanva’s résumé and professional profile.

Problem

Geospatial analytics combined large daily data volumes, regional model selection, GPU scheduling, and latency-sensitive map delivery. The platform needed to make those workloads efficient and dependable across regions.

Scale and constraints

Scale

  • More than 1 TB processed each day by ETL and ML pipelines.
  • Multi-regional infrastructure for geospatial analytics.
  • GPU queue with automated regional model evaluation.

Constraints

  • Coordinate compute and model selection across regions.
  • Reduce latency and infrastructure cost while preserving analytical output.
  • Prevent schema issues from repeatedly breaking data and ML pipelines.

Sudhanva’s ownership

Sudhanva built the multi-regional ML infrastructure and data pipelines and architected the GPU queue.

  • Multi-regional ML infrastructure.
  • ETL and ML pipelines.
  • GPU queue and automated A/B testing for regional model selection.

Architecture at a safe level

This public architecture describes system responsibilities and leaves out internal service names and proprietary topology. The relevant boundaries were workload execution, orchestration, data movement, observability, and delivery.

  • Designed regional infrastructure around the location and delivery needs of geospatial workloads.
  • Automated model evaluation and GPU scheduling, replacing manual regional choices.
  • Improved schema handling in the daily data path.

Engineering decisions and tradeoffs

  • Multi-regional execution improves proximity and resilience but increases operational coordination.
  • GPU capacity and model-selection automation had to be weighed against cloud cost.

Results

  • Improved inference efficiency by 75%.
  • Reduced map-rendering latency by 50%.
  • Reduced pipeline failures caused by schema issues by 30%.
  • Saved $500,000 annually in cloud costs.

Reliability and operations

  • Schema-focused pipeline improvements reduced a recurring class of failures.
  • Automated regional model evaluation reduced manual operational choices.

Transferable lessons

  • Data contracts are a reliability concern for ML systems as much as a data-engineering one.
  • Regional model delivery should be evaluated with latency, compute efficiency, and cost together.

Technologies

  • Geospatial ML
  • ETL
  • GPU scheduling
  • Multi-region cloud infrastructure
  • A/B testing

Continue exploring

From the blog

Related writing

CoGeoTIFF Research on Space Tech SaaS Platform at Pixxel

Research notes on Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs at Pixxel: the tile servers that exist, what it takes to build a product on COGs, Sentinel conversion cases, and AWS cost estimates.

#portfolio

Leaving Pixxel

I thought I'd take some time to write and thank Pixxel and everyone I have had the chance to work with.

#career #goodbye
Next case study · 10B+ rows Billion-Row Batch Inference